Group processing builds metacognition, the ability to reflect on one's learning. Part of metacognition is being able to to plan an approach and follow through with the plan. Executive function is when a student can take what they have learned and apply it in a new situation or when something unexpected happens. This makes me think of how our non-fiction writing and focus in data team works. "Without the of instructional routines that foster metacognition and executive function, students would have a very difficult time developing these capacities" (p. 86).
The authors discuss three routines to help support group processing.
1. Self-Monitoring Questionnaires: Examples would include smiling and frowning faces, Likert scale (1-5), and open-ended questions. See p. 87 for examples. Using the questionnaires establish a common basis for discussion during group processing.
2. Learning Logs: They are used to keep track of student learning. They can last for a few days or weeks, and, possibly longer. Students use the log to reflect what they understand, find confusing, or have questions about. I liked the quote on p. 88. "[My learning log is] a discussion with myself on paper." They caution that the logs are used just to keep track of their experience. They discusses have pre-planned questions. There is a great example on p. 89.
3. Roundtable activities: This allows all members to reflect on their work. A couple topics for discussion include: Name something that surprised or confused you and identify something you learned that you will use in another class.
This chapter had a lot of useful information. I thought back to Hattie's recommendation of using self-monitoring/self-reporting of grades. This is an area where we could get "the most bang for our buck."
There is something in this chapter that every teacher, no matter their content area, would be able to use. I think teachers try to incorporate group work in their classrooms, but seldom allow time for self-reflection. Again, this will have to be modeled.